Daredevil Message Board
The Board Without Fear!
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The Message Board is currently in read-only mode, as the software is now out of date. Several features and pages have been removed. If/When I get time I intend to re-launch the board with updated software.


Looks like the Marvel Universe Might be Rebooted Soon
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Daredevil Message Board Forum Index -> The comics
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Kuljit Mithra
Hardcore


Joined: 29 Jul 2004
Posts: 1530
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2015 4:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

And the last press release:

WARZONES!
Marvel Presents the Last of Three New Series Banners For SECRET WARS!

New York, NY—January 23, 2015— The future begins here! When everything ends, there is only Secret Wars. Today, Marvel is proud to announce WARZONES!, the final umbrella of titles launching during Secret Wars! WARZONES! joins LAST DAYS and BATTLEWORLD as the three different categories of titles launching throughout Secret Wars, each with their own unique type of story to tell!

“If you want a glimpse of what the future holds, you’ll find it in the WARZONES titles,” says Marvel Editor-in-Chief Axel Alonso. “Our creators let their imaginations run wild as they lay down the foundations for the future. Whether we’re revisiting the most popular events from Marvel’s past or telling completely new stories, you won’t believe what we’ve got in store for you.”

All that remains in the cosmos is Battleworld, the strange, patchwork realm playing host to countless realities, all existing side-by-side, fused into a single planet! Titles carrying the WARZONES! banner tell stories of the individual dominions of Battleworld. What happens within their borders? What heroes guard their skies? What villains conspire within? How does over 75 years of Marvel’s epic history play out now that Battleworld is all there is?

“To be clear, WARZONES! titles are NOT fill-ins. These are the event caliber books, magnified to the Nth degree,” says Marvel SVP Sales & Marketing David Gabriel. “Secret Wars has afforded us a completely unique opportunity to tell huge, epic, event-sized stories within the framework of this new, patchwork planet – events within events. These titles will lay the building blocks and groundwork for what’s next, if that gives any indication of how important they are!”

While the Secret Wars rage on, the foundation of a new Marvel Universe take shape within the war-torn domains across Battleworld. The future of Marvel begins in the WARZONES!
_________________
Kuljit Mithra
www.manwithoutfear.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
admiralpetty
Flying Blind


Joined: 22 Jun 2014
Posts: 48
Location: Kalispell, MT

PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2015 11:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

RGdesigner wrote:
I've long been in favor of a reboot for Marvel. I love Bendis and Brubaker's runs, and mostly really like Waid's, and I have no problem with them being wiped away for a new fresh start of some sort. Now I don't think Marvel will totally throw out everything. It will likely be similar to what DC did.

Some of my predictions (not necessarily what I'm hoping) for Marvel's "reboot":
Most of the last 25 years of stories never happened.
Older iconic stories still stand. (Born Again, Dark Phoenix, Demon in a Bottle)

Daredevil - Secret identity restored except for Fisk, Karen Page alive, back in Hell's Kitchen, never married
Spiderman - Gwen Stacy alive, never any clones, younger
X-Men - Wolverine alive, Jean alive, Xavier alive, Psylocke was always asian, "Original 5" are no longer the original 5
Iron Man - will basically stay "superior" but not as villainous
Nick Fury - was always black, no son
Black Widow - no longer old or tied to WW2
Captain America - basically the same, but more recently "defrosted" so they can really play up the "man out of time".
Bucky - back to being somewhat brainwashed and dangerous.
Avengers - same cast as movie obviously, Civil War never happened so they can rehash it when the movies do it.
Any character that can be made Inhuman (i.e. Quicksilver/Scarlet Witch) will be.
FF - exist but won't appear until the fallout from movie.
Carol Danvers was never Binary or any of that. Rogue never had her powers.
Punisher - Iraq war vet, not as old
Miles Morales and Kamala Khan go to same school that Parker does/did.


Interesting predictions, I could definitely see some of them coming true(particularly ones that simplify the origins of characters like Psylocke and Captain Marvel). However the one concerning Gwen Stacy seems highly unlikely, seeing as how Gwen is getting her own alternate universe series as Spider Woman. Also, she was never really that interesting of a character in the old stories, her death is the reason she is looked upon so fondly(also it delivers a really powerful moment for Spidey).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Guardian-Devil
Tree of Knowledge


Joined: 17 Sep 2005
Posts: 256
Location: Greece

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2015 4:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

RGdesigner wrote:

Daredevil - Secret identity restored except for Fisk, Karen Page alive, back in Hell's Kitchen, never married
Spiderman - Gwen Stacy alive, never any clones, younger.


As far as DD i'm 100% with you except NO KAREN BACK FROM THE DEAD!!!

As for Spidey Gwen is already back (alternative universe).... Rolling Eyes
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
train
Guardian Devil


Joined: 29 Jul 2004
Posts: 659
Location: Hell's Pantry

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2015 11:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

For some reason, I think this sounds like a pretty cool idea. I'm all for wiping the slate clean and starting again. That's one of the things that I enjoyed about the movies. The root of the character is there, but there are a few tweaks to the origin or the villain that made it fresh to an old guy like me. I even think those iconic stories can be wiped as well. Why not? It doesn't make the story any less enjoyable to re-read and it gives the new writers an unplowed field to play in.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LightningandIce
Flying Blind


Joined: 31 Jan 2014
Posts: 95

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2015 7:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have mixed feelings. I don't care much for big crossovers, but whatever. It sounds good in theory but in practice these things usually just turn into gimmicks.

What I would like to see is a permanent, satisfying ending to the long term characters that allows them all to live happily ever after. If they were going to do it, I would rather see the books get their own organic endings in-story rather than mashing everything together in some big contrived "Crisis" knockoff.

As far as the reboot goes, I would be completely okay if it were a true reboot. I do not want to see some kind of retcon where they just change characters back to the way they were before but they are still the same characters in the same continuity as before. I also don't want an "alternate universe." Just start completely over, blank slate, no history, just brand new, the same way like they are doing with the movies.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
admiralpetty
Flying Blind


Joined: 22 Jun 2014
Posts: 48
Location: Kalispell, MT

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2015 10:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

train wrote:
For some reason, I think this sounds like a pretty cool idea. I'm all for wiping the slate clean and starting again. That's one of the things that I enjoyed about the movies. The root of the character is there, but there are a few tweaks to the origin or the villain that made it fresh to an old guy like me. I even think those iconic stories can be wiped as well. Why not? It doesn't make the story any less enjoyable to re-read and it gives the new writers an unplowed field to play in.


LightningandIce wrote:
I have mixed feelings. I don't care much for big crossovers, but whatever. It sounds good in theory but in practice these things usually just turn into gimmicks.

What I would like to see is a permanent, satisfying ending to the long term characters that allows them all to live happily ever after. If they were going to do it, I would rather see the books get their own organic endings in-story rather than mashing everything together in some big contrived "Crisis" knockoff.

As far as the reboot goes, I would be completely okay if it were a true reboot. I do not want to see some kind of retcon where they just change characters back to the way they were before but they are still the same characters in the same continuity as before. I also don't want an "alternate universe." Just start completely over, blank slate, no history, just brand new, the same way like they are doing with the movies.


I agree with you both on some points. Even if it is a total reboot that doesn't make the old stories any less valid. Even for canon obsessed fans, the old stories are technically still canon, just pre-Secret Wars shakeup.

As for concerns with how it is handled, those are very valid. Take DC's latest shakeup with Flashpoint and the New 52. One of the biggest issues with how it was handled was how quickly they did it, a number of story lines didn't get properly wrapped up before the event. Additionally the event itself, while the concept had promise, was to short and not fleshed out properly, not exactly fitting for the ending of a whole decades long continuity.

Additionally this led to other issues with how it was handled after the event was over and the new continuity had started. For starters, some characters got fresh reboots and others were left mostly untouched. Batman for instance, has still had four Robins and most of his history is supposed to have happened, yet they never specified what has and hasn't happened for sure. Also we are told all of this has taken place in a five or six year period, which doesn't make sense, even by comic book logic. Then you have stories like Batman Inc. by Morrison, stories that really should have been wrapped up in the prior continuity, needlessly cluttering up what is supposed to be a clean slate.

You also have the good points, the characters given clean slates like Wonder Woman and Green Arrow have had some excellent new stories written because the writers aren't tied down by previous continuity. Even Batman has had some good tales written by Scott Snyder, particularly because Snyder has made sure to blaze a new trail rather than being tied down by the previous continuity, even giving Batman an excellent new origin tale with his Zero Year story. I can say as a Batman fan who owns a great deal of his stories from previous continuity, Year One being a particular favorite, that I'm not bothered by new authors blazing new trails unencumbered by old continuity(and I still enjoy reading his old stories just as much as before). And we all have to admit, some Marvel characters, Spider-Man and the X-Men in particular, have some really confusing continuity and terrible stories that it would be nice to see cleaned up.

But I can understand other fans as well, part of the fun of comics is the years long continuity and how it ties into the stories written by different authors through the years. Bullseye's killing of Karen wouldn't have quite as powerful if it didn't mirror his killing of Elektra in Miller's old stories. But I choose to look at a new continuity as a chance to be in on the new stories that are being told and experience new powerful moments from the new authors. After all, classic stories like the deaths of Elektra and Gwen Stacy are still great reads(but most of us new what was going to happen before we read them in trades), but its nice to read new stories with new major surprises that will echo down through the years.

Whatever Marvel does, I intend to keep an open mind, and expect that I'll probably like some of what they do and dislike some of what they do, just like with DC's New 52.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jriddle
Playing to the Camera


Joined: 19 May 2011
Posts: 129

PostPosted: Sun Jan 25, 2015 12:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

admiralpetty wrote:
As for concerns with how it is handled, those are very valid. Take DC's latest shakeup with Flashpoint and the New 52. One of the biggest issues with how it was handled was how quickly they did it, a number of story lines didn't get properly wrapped up before the event. Additionally the event itself, while the concept had promise, was to short and not fleshed out properly, not exactly fitting for the ending of a whole decades long continuity.


I don't know exactly what Marvel has planned--I suspect (and certainly hope) a complete wipe is not in the works--but the last thing in the world Marvel needs to do is follow DC down that particular rabbit-hole. If there's going to be a reboot, it doesn't ever need to be done more than once (and afterwards the mega-crossover events need to stop for the foreseeable future). DC reboots so often that you don't dare read anything they publish set in the main DCU; if you find one you like, it will be gone in 9 months. They're publishing most of their books these days (and for many years now) strictly to keep the properties alive and the rights squared away. A wipe like this can be used to clean up a lot of crap (thankfully, Waid's DD seems likely to entirely disappear, though I'm not sure Marvel hasn't asked him to launch yet another #1 with a new artist), but it causes a LOT of problems, the sort of problems no sales gimmick is worth.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
DesignDevil
Playing to the Camera


Joined: 11 Sep 2009
Posts: 157
Location: Tennessee

PostPosted: Sun Jan 25, 2015 12:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I meant to say in my original post, I'm 100% in favor of a total ground zero restart for all of Marvel. I just don't think they will. The previous list was what I think we'll see. They will copy DC (like they've never done that before Rolling Eyes ) and it will be half assed, because they won't have the guts to disregard all their history and start completely over.

However it falls with this "reboot", Daredevil and so many other characters deserve a real ending in their books. As others have said, to give closure, not a "to be continued in Secret War Tie-In# **** all". Which is what we're unfortunately very likely to get.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mike Murdock
Golden Age


Joined: 08 Sep 2014
Posts: 1750

PostPosted: Sun Jan 25, 2015 10:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah, I think that's the biggest problem I have. There are lots of creative writers doing their own tales and most of them will get cut short in an unsatisfactory way to do a reboot instead.
_________________
Matt Murdock's cooler twin brother

Not sure what to read next? Check out the Book Club for some ideas!

I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake!
Thomas More - A Man for All Seasons
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
james castle
Devil in Cell-Block D


Joined: 30 Jul 2004
Posts: 1999
Location: Toronto, Ontario

PostPosted: Sun Jan 25, 2015 4:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

What I don't get is how continuity gets in the way anyway. Sure, there are big moments like Born Again and Last Rites but there's also Playing to the Camera or that time DD fought The Surgeon General. The magic of comics is that all this stuff sort of did but also sort of didn't happen.

Is anyone enjoying Waid's run any less because they don't know about the time Daredevil fought the Bengal or they're not super clear who or what a Micah Sin is? Does anyone not like Colossus because they don't know he went through the Siege Perilous and became a painter and also died, but didn't, curing what was essentially mutant AIDS? No. All this stuff is fun for people who know it and has no effect on people who don't.

The only small issue is people who nitpick continuity across decades but those people will never be happy anyway.

A reboot is more of a marketing move than anything else.
_________________
JC

So why can't you see the funny side?
Why aren't you laughing?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
train
Guardian Devil


Joined: 29 Jul 2004
Posts: 659
Location: Hell's Pantry

PostPosted: Sun Jan 25, 2015 4:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There are things that are ignored in regard to continuity but I think your missing the bigger picture. Like you mentioned, most won't raise a stink if a story runs against the continuity of Angar the Screamer. But with the current universe, Waid decides to write a story that brought Karen back to life with no explanation it would be met with resistance. That's why I'm cool with a complete reboot.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
james castle
Devil in Cell-Block D


Joined: 30 Jul 2004
Posts: 1999
Location: Toronto, Ontario

PostPosted: Sun Jan 25, 2015 5:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

train wrote:
There are things that are ignored in regard to continuity but I think your missing the bigger picture. Like you mentioned, most won't raise a stink if a story runs against the continuity of Angar the Screamer. But with the current universe, Waid decides to write a story that brought Karen back to life with no explanation it would be met with resistance. That's why I'm cool with a complete reboot.


Good point. I guess Karen is the real sticking point. Even so, I'm not sure a complete reboot is necessary. I've always thought a great event would be some sort of "Wave of Resurrection". Some magicy character does...whatever and the result is a mass of resurrections across the Marvel U. You could have a couple months of stories about how all the characters react to having their friends/enemies/uncles alive again and then kill off all the people you didn't really want to bring back.
_________________
JC

So why can't you see the funny side?
Why aren't you laughing?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
jriddle
Playing to the Camera


Joined: 19 May 2011
Posts: 129

PostPosted: Sun Jan 25, 2015 6:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

RGdesigner wrote:
They will copy DC (like they've never done that before Rolling Eyes )


In almost every case for the last 50+ years, it's been the other way around. If Marvel is going to start aping DC on a matter of this scale though, it needs to be a thoughtfully-engineered one-off and done. DC has destroyed their comics line by this sort of nonsense.

RGdesigner wrote:
However it falls with this "reboot", Daredevil and so many other characters deserve a real ending in their books. As others have said, to give closure, not a "to be continued in Secret War Tie-In# **** all". Which is what we're unfortunately very likely to get.


That's a massive problem not limited to this current project. The huge, line-wide crossovers are a pestilence; they always have been. They need to be made excedingly rare.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Mike Murdock
Golden Age


Joined: 08 Sep 2014
Posts: 1750

PostPosted: Sun Jan 25, 2015 9:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

james castle wrote:
What I don't get is how continuity gets in the way anyway. Sure, there are big moments like Born Again and Last Rites but there's also Playing to the Camera or that time DD fought The Surgeon General. The magic of comics is that all this stuff sort of did but also sort of didn't happen.


I think Last Rites is the perfect example of why continuity is not an obstacle. It's my favorite D.G. Chichester story arc (with 34 Hours being my favorite issue). But the big events in that issue have all circled back to normal. The Kingpin fell, but he also came back since then.

Deaths of characters is obviously not an obstacle in the Marvel universe. Some would creatively be bad ideas and I think resurrecting Karen Page would be a bad idea, but it's certainly possible without a reboot. And I'm not sure why it would be significantly better with a reboot. The whole point of not resurrecting her is it undermines the impact of her death. Having it so she never died at all isn't dramatically different.
_________________
Matt Murdock's cooler twin brother

Not sure what to read next? Check out the Book Club for some ideas!

I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake!
Thomas More - A Man for All Seasons
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
train
Guardian Devil


Joined: 29 Jul 2004
Posts: 659
Location: Hell's Pantry

PostPosted: Mon Jan 26, 2015 1:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The beauty of a reboot is that you'd be able to twist continuity around in ways that a simple resurrection story can't. Let's say the writer wants to do a love triangle story with Karen Page, Matt and Heather Glenn. With a blank slate, it's possible to do things that would otherwise be inaccessible. It could be done with 'new' love interests, but what could make this fun for new and old readers alike is that a good writer that does his homework could hide pre secret war Easter eggs in a story...sort of like what Waid did with the Hawkeye, Black Widow, Dd "fight" from the Bronze Age.

I have to admit, it would take a lot of editorial balls to pull the trigger on a full reboot. I hope they either do it all the way or not at all.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Daredevil Message Board Forum Index -> The comics All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group