|
Daredevil Message Board The Board Without Fear!
|
The Message Board is currently in read-only mode, as the software is now out of date. Several features and pages have been removed. If/When I get time I intend to re-launch the board with updated software.
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
DesignDevil Playing to the Camera
Joined: 11 Sep 2009 Posts: 157 Location: Tennessee
|
Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2014 1:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Come, now, Mike, you can keep up better than that. That comment was made in response to the false assertions that Waid had made DD the healthiest it had been in years, that he had "restored credibility to a damaged brand," that he had "pushed the book and the character to heights not reached for many years in terms of critical acclaim and reader popularity." That's enthusiastic fanboyism, but it can hardly be made to match the reality (which is that Waid is a low seller and seems to have been the 2nd-lowest-selling writer in the book's history). |
This is what I was commenting on also with the sales data. Sales are absolutely not a measure of quality, but they can be a measure of popularity. Waid's run has lots of critical acclaim, most of it deserved, but Bendis and Brubaker's did also. The ""pushed the book and the character to heights not reached for many years in terms of critical acclaim and reader popularity." was the hyperbole I was responding to. If anything Waid has returned/maintained the status quo of Daredevil as a moderately selling but very well written book. Daredevil has a devoted, but small fan base and Waid's run has been mostly popular within that, but it certainly has not reinvented, nor has it destroyed the wheel. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
WilsonFisk Flying Blind
Joined: 04 Nov 2014 Posts: 41 Location: Scotland
|
Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2014 1:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jriddle wrote: | Come, now, Mike, you can keep up better than that. That comment was made in response to the false assertions that Waid had made DD the healthiest it had been in years, that he had "restored credibility to a damaged brand," that he had "pushed the book and the character to heights not reached for many years in terms of critical acclaim and reader popularity." That's enthusiastic fanboyism, but it can hardly be made to match the reality (which is that Waid is a low seller and seems to have been the 2nd-lowest-selling writer in the book's history). |
So are you saying that Waid's Daredevil has NOT been acclaimed by critics?
Are you suggesting that Waid's Daredevil is NOT generally popular amongst the readership?
Are you saying that, on average, Waid's Daredevil is NOT better received than Shadowland?
Last edited by WilsonFisk on Sun Nov 23, 2014 1:53 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
WilsonFisk Flying Blind
Joined: 04 Nov 2014 Posts: 41 Location: Scotland
|
Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2014 1:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
RGdesigner wrote: | This is what I was commenting on also with the sales data. Sales are absolutely not a measure of quality, but they can be a measure of popularity. Waid's run has lots of critical acclaim, most of it deserved, but Bendis and Brubaker's did also. The ""pushed the book and the character to heights not reached for many years in terms of critical acclaim and reader popularity." was the hyperbole I was responding to. If anything Waid has returned/maintained the status quo of Daredevil as a moderately selling but very well written book. Daredevil has a devoted, but small fan base and Waid's run has been mostly popular within that, but it certainly has not reinvented, nor has it destroyed the wheel. |
I don't see how what I said clashes with what you said. We're both saying that Mark Waid's Daredevil run has enjoyed the most recognition from critics and the most popularity from the readership that the book has had in some time. "Many years" might have been better substituted as "several years," but going back, it's definitely higher regarded than Diggle's run, and though I really like the Brubaker run and it was generally well received by fans, I can't recall it generating awards and critical raves to the degree of the Waid run, to the point where some of the most respected Daredevil commentators on the web, like Ryan K Lindsay, talk about it now as an underrated run. I think you likely have to go back to Bendis, and even then earlier in Bendis' run, to find when the book was last at such heights of acclaim.
I didn't talk about massive boosts in sales or anything to contradict your point. I certainly wasn't gorging in hyperbole like "this run was a cancer on Daredevil." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
WilsonFisk Flying Blind
Joined: 04 Nov 2014 Posts: 41 Location: Scotland
|
Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2014 1:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jonny_Anonymous wrote: | Batman, Spider-Man and Superman have pretty much had a consistent tone for years and years and nobody complains that they are telling the same stories over. |
Batman actually had a similar problem. Grant Morrison's run is, in my opinion, goi to be recognised years from now as one of the all-time great runs on that character, but throughout the run it was vocally hated by many people because it was unusual and struck a different tone than the usual gritty crime vibe that's most popular.
As for Spider-Man, Dan Slott literally got death threats for his Superior Spider-Man storyline, so that says all we need to about their response to shifts in status quo. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
beneverett Flying Blind
Joined: 22 Nov 2012 Posts: 17
|
Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2014 2:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My final two cents on this whole thing.
From the numbers I've seen (though I don't actively study these things) It appears that single-issue sales have been declining over the past decade, and maybe even earlier then that. And this seems to be something that the whole industry is dealing with to a large degree, not just Marvel and this particular title. The numbers remain steady, so the argument that Waid has hurt the book, at least in terms of sales, isn't terribly convincing to me. If comics sold as well as they did at least 30 years ago, then it might be a valid point.
This "DD is blind Spider-Man" thing is hogwash. If anything, I think Matt/DD has been behaving much more responsibly over the past few years then Spidey has in a long while.
Chris Samnee is an incredible artist, I only wish I'd known of him sooner. If anyone dislikes his artwork, that's fine. But some of the comments I've seen thrown around here about the man's work are not only simplistic and uninformed, but just plain insulting.
The whole Silver Age redux argument doesn't ring true to me either. Frankly, any declaration that anything from the Silver Age or pre-Miller is somehow invalid is asinine. I could agree that many writers pre-Miller didn't quite know how to handle the character or at least pin him down, but Waid clearly doesn't have that problem. He is aware of what has come pre and post Miller, and is building on it in what I think is a very thoughtful way. He knows (like every great writer on the title) that DD's worst enemy is himself, he's just presenting it differently.
And this "oppressive optimism" garbage? These comments from http://community.comicbookresources.com/showthread.php?25222-When-Mark-Waid-s-run-on-Daredevil-has-finished-will-Daredevil-be-dark-again
sum up my feelings on that issue:
-
Originally Posted by gurkle
I think when people describe it as not dark they're talking about two things that set it apart from the previous 30 years of Daredevil. One is that it acknowledges Matt has a pretty good, fun life in many ways. And the other is that it doesn't look dark and grim. It can do dark and grim stories and make Matt's life miserable as usual, but fundamentally it seems to come from an optimistic place in a way we hadn't seen since the ending of Born Again.
[reply by FanboyStranger]
I'll agree on the "it doesn't look dark" as Samnee's art and the brighter palette doesn't scream "grim'n'gritty", but almost every issue of DD I've read since Waid started has this subtext of Matt walking on the razor's edge of another nervous breakdown. Superficially, it seems like fun to be Matt because he's putting up a good front, but that's because he's in denial about his life, which is why Foggy was checking him. Then, with his move to San Fran, things seemed better for him-- at least after they got Foggy out of danger to continue his treatment-- but since he's been there, he's had The Shroud using him as a pawn/punching bag in a gang war, revelations about his family life and the lies he's believed, and the Purple Man's kids running wild destroying anyone in their way. There's been some pretty heavy stuff going down, but Waid's assuming that we don't need to be told how hard Matt has it every other page.
In Waid's DD, we've had: murder, grave-robbing, decapitation, cancer, more murder, racist conspiracies, dark magic, organized crime wars, family secrets involving violence and post-partum depression, and mind-controlling, psychopathic teens run amok. This isn't bright stuff.
-
FS neglected to mention other story points involving drug smuggling, human trafficking, suicide, torture, child abuse and implied rape.
Last edited by beneverett on Sun Nov 23, 2014 5:01 pm; edited 4 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
james castle Devil in Cell-Block D
Joined: 30 Jul 2004 Posts: 1999 Location: Toronto, Ontario
|
Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2014 2:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
WilsonFisk wrote: | Jonny_Anonymous wrote: | Batman, Spider-Man and Superman have pretty much had a consistent tone for years and years and nobody complains that they are telling the same stories over. |
Batman actually had a similar problem. Grant Morrison's run is, in my opinion, goi to be recognised years from now as one of the all-time great runs on that character, but throughout the run it was vocally hated by many people because it was unusual and struck a different tone than the usual gritty crime vibe that's most popular.
As for Spider-Man, Dan Slott literally got death threats for his Superior Spider-Man storyline, so that says all we need to about their response to shifts in status quo. |
Yep. And before that Morrison's New X-Men run was hated for its new take on things. Again, it's now (rightly) celebrated as amazing.
Everything amazing in comics was new once. All this "tone" garbage is just a smoke screen used by people who don't like new things and want to stay forever with the old things that they like. _________________ JC
So why can't you see the funny side?
Why aren't you laughing? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
james castle Devil in Cell-Block D
Joined: 30 Jul 2004 Posts: 1999 Location: Toronto, Ontario
|
Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2014 2:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
beneverett wrote: |
In Waid's DD, we've had: murder, grave-robbing, decapitation, cancer, more murder, racist conspiracies, dark magic, organized crime wars, family secrets involving violence and post-partum depression, and mind-controlling, psychopathic teens run amok. This isn't bright stuff.
FS neglected to mention other story points involving drug smuggling, human trafficking, suicide, torture, child abuse and implied rape. |
Again, you're forgetting the fact that jriddle hasn't even bothered to read Waid's run before commenting repeatedly and viciously about it. He obviously doesn't care what Waid has actually written, he just wants to complain from a position of ignorance. _________________ JC
So why can't you see the funny side?
Why aren't you laughing? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
WilsonFisk Flying Blind
Joined: 04 Nov 2014 Posts: 41 Location: Scotland
|
Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2014 3:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Great post, beneverett, and ditto on the praise for Chris Samnee. The guy is a gifted artist and an incredible storyteller, one of my favourites working today. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jriddle Playing to the Camera
Joined: 19 May 2011 Posts: 129
|
Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2014 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
WilsonFisk wrote: | RGdesigner wrote: | This is what I was commenting on also with the sales data. Sales are absolutely not a measure of quality, but they can be a measure of popularity. Waid's run has lots of critical acclaim, most of it deserved, but Bendis and Brubaker's did also. The ""pushed the book and the character to heights not reached for many years in terms of critical acclaim and reader popularity." was the hyperbole I was responding to. If anything Waid has returned/maintained the status quo of Daredevil as a moderately selling but very well written book. Daredevil has a devoted, but small fan base and Waid's run has been mostly popular within that, but it certainly has not reinvented, nor has it destroyed the wheel. |
I don't see how what I said clashes with what you said. We're both saying that Mark Waid's Daredevil run has enjoyed the most recognition from critics and the most popularity from the readership that the book has had in some time. "Many years" might have been better substituted as "several years," but going back, it's definitely higher regarded than Diggle's run, and though I really like the Brubaker run and it was generally well received by fans, I can't recall it generating awards and critical raves to the degree of the Waid run |
For his work on Daredevil, Brubaker won 3 Eisner awards (nominated for a 4th) and a Harvey, and he outsold Waid.
WilsonFisk wrote: | I think you likely have to go back to Bendis, and even then earlier in Bendis' run, to find when the book was last at such heights of acclaim. |
That's only 8 years ago, with 4 of the intervening years having been written by Waid. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
WilsonFisk Flying Blind
Joined: 04 Nov 2014 Posts: 41 Location: Scotland
|
Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2014 8:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Good catch on Brubaker's Eisner wins, I'll acknowledge I overlooked that. I forgot he won those awards while also writing DAREDEVIL, as he was also doing CRIMINAL and CAPTAIN AMERICA at the time. Though it should be pointed out that, though DAREDEVIL was nominated for an Eisner for Best Continuing Series during Brubaker's run, the Waid/Samnee run is the first time DAREDEVIL has won the Eisner for Best Continuing Series since Bendis and Maleev won it back in 2003, over a decade ago. And Chris Samnee's win for Best Artist is, I believe, the first time an artist has won the award for work on DAREDEVIL since the Eisner Awards were founded back in 1988, though Miller and Mazzuchelli may have won one in their predecessors, the Kirby Awards, I'd have to check. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mike Murdock Golden Age

Joined: 08 Sep 2014 Posts: 1750
|
Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2014 9:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jriddle wrote: |
For his work on Daredevil, Brubaker won 3 Eisner awards (nominated for a 4th) and a Harvey, and he outsold Waid. |
OK, I understand why you mentioned sales last time (although I didn't until you explained it to me), but I'll need you to explain it this time as well for me to understand it. _________________ Matt Murdock's cooler twin brother
Not sure what to read next? Check out the Book Club for some ideas!
I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake!
Thomas More - A Man for All Seasons |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jriddle Playing to the Camera
Joined: 19 May 2011 Posts: 129
|
Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2014 9:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mike Murdock wrote: | jriddle wrote: |
For his work on Daredevil, Brubaker won 3 Eisner awards (nominated for a 4th) and a Harvey, and he outsold Waid. |
OK, I understand why you mentioned sales last time (although I didn't until you explained it to me), but I'll need you to explain it this time as well for me to understand it. |
lol. Mike, I quote the stuff to which I'm responding. That particular bit was in response to the assertion that Waid had enjoyed "the most popularity from the readership that the book has had in some time," combined with the suggestion that Brubaker was underrated. Brubaker--like every previous DD writer except Kelly--sold better than Waid.
And I didn't bring up the sales data earlier, Jonny_Anonymous did. I merely brought in some hard numbers to show he was correct. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
WilsonFisk Flying Blind
Joined: 04 Nov 2014 Posts: 41 Location: Scotland
|
Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2014 10:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jriddle wrote: | lol. Mike, I quote the stuff to which I'm responding. That particular bit was in response to the assertion that Waid had enjoyed "the most popularity from the readership that the book has had in some time," combined with the suggestion that Brubaker was underrated. Brubaker--like every previous DD writer except Kelly--sold better than Waid.
And I didn't bring up the sales data earlier, Jonny_Anonymous did. I merely brought in some hard numbers to show he was correct. |
I still don't see what actual point you're making with the sales, though. How many people are reading the book and how popular the book is with those who are reading it are two different points, so bringing up the book's sales isn't really addressing that. Either you're using the point that Waid's sales are lower than other writers to back up your statement about Waid being a cancer on the title - in which case I could use the same rationale to argue that Brubaker was a cancer because he sold less than Bendis, and Bendis was a cancer because he sold less than Kevin Smith - or as you suggested earlier the sales are utterly irrelevant and you have decreed that Waid and Samnee are a cancer on Daredevil regardless of what sales are, in which case it seems rather pointless to bring it up. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Darkdevil Humanity's Fathom

Joined: 04 Apr 2009 Posts: 331 Location: The Bright, Sunny South
|
Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2014 1:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
And so it goes.....
I knew some here would be cheering from the rafters about the news of Waid's departure. For those of us who've enjoyed Waid's run, such as myself, I'm sad to see his departure but really, we all knew that this day was coming at some point.
I do believe that Waid's work has been greatly enhanced by the artistry of Samnee, almost to the same degree that Mike Wieringo was able achieve when he worked with Waid. So I hope this isn't the last work we'll see from this creative duo.
We all love DD so hopefully, whatever changes (or retcons) come from the next creative team, we will all find something to cheer for and love about the future of DD. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Nightwing2001 Flying Blind

Joined: 28 Feb 2011 Posts: 94 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2014 6:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I just wanted to bring something up about the sales that I haven't seen anyone address yet and that is I think the slow decline in Daredevil's sales (and sales of most comics in general) can also be attributed to the fact a lot of comic buyers are now into waiting for trades instead of buying monthlies. I think this is probably a lot more of a realistic reason to do with this than some kind of "this writer is a cancer and that's why the sales are slipping" conspiracy theory.
As for Waid leaving, I'm ok with it. He had a long run and I am looking forward to seeing what a new writer can bring to the title. Generally I enjoyed his run (flaws and all) Sure it wasn't perfect, but back when it started it was definetly a fresh breath of air from the doom and gloom that the comic was wallowing in. Frankly I would like to see the book get a little darker in tone again once Waid leaves but nothing to that extent again. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
|