Daredevil Message Board
The Board Without Fear!
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The Message Board is currently in read-only mode, as the software is now out of date. Several features and pages have been removed. If/When I get time I intend to re-launch the board with updated software.


The Future of Daredevil
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 11, 12, 13  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Daredevil Message Board Forum Index -> The comics
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
jriddle
Playing to the Camera


Joined: 19 May 2011
Posts: 129

PostPosted: Fri Jul 11, 2014 2:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

humanaccident wrote:
Not sure I see it, even reading the early issues, here would be my summary of Spiderman/Peter Parker - geeky, struggles with women, has money troubles, a bit of a joker as a superhero to hide his insecurity. None of this applied to DD/Matt Murdock, he is successful, confident to the point of arogance, too good with women and can be a bit of a joker as a superhero.

Or is it just me that sees past the swinging around New York thing?


Of your list, only Peter's money troubles really separate the characters in their early incarnations. Peter isn't a joker as superhero to hide his insecurities; Spider-Man is, for him, a release from the anxieties of day-to-day life (just as is the case with Matt and Daredevil). Matt isn't even remotely "good with women"--he broods over Karen Page for years, the situations and thought-balloons lifted straight from Spider-Man.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Darkdevil
Humanity's Fathom


Joined: 04 Apr 2009
Posts: 331
Location: The Bright, Sunny South

PostPosted: Fri Jul 11, 2014 11:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It occurs to me that my responses to this latest round in this 'discussion' are merely re-treads of what I've said previously.

Round and round we go and nothing new to add or do. You're not going to change my mind, I'm not going to change your mind.

Suffice it to say, I've voiced my opinions on why I think Waid's run is worthy both here and in other threads. Obviously, we have completely different perceptions and views on the same character (which, of course, is a hallmark of a great character).

So, the most I can say to you, is that hopefully you will find the next creative team on DD more to your liking.

Meanwhile, I will continue to read and enjoy Daredevil.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
humanaccident
Flying Blind


Joined: 10 Jul 2014
Posts: 26

PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2014 5:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

jriddle -

There have been numerous times where Spidey has said he jokes when nervous, maybe I worded it wrong but thats what he does, the escape/release aspect is a bit true also though so I think we are both partly right on that.

Also I never saw DD being a release from day to day life for Matt, more a way to do good where he can't in his job, like its his way of operating within the system but also outside it? There have been numerous stories about how he almost sees himself as a different person with the mask on, so its not about releasing stress, its about doing good. Or am I misunderstanding?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Francesco
Underboss


Joined: 08 Jun 2006
Posts: 1307

PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2014 12:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I don't see how it prevents him from operating as DD outside of court. Also "Waid-yay!" sarcasm isn't necessary when referring to those of us who enjoy Waid's run. I don't think the man is a god, and there are parts of his run that could have been handled better, particularly the portion of his run after the Bullseye confrontation leading up to the current volume.


"those of us who enjoy Waid's run" is too long, and also I have decided that "Waid-yay! party" sounds funnier, and so in keeping with the idea that I must tone down my grim and gritty side, I've decided that I'll keep using it.

As for the idea that Matt could no longer effectively practicing law because everyone was bringing up the fact he was suspected to be Daredevil, my friends, that was something that was just brutally and hamfistedly imposed by Waid.

Anyone could've written stories in which Matt was practicing law, albeit with some inconvenience given by his dual identity as superhero being more or less known (heck, since She-Hulk practices law even if she's big and green and flashy). Waid has suddenly decided it couldn't be done.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
james castle
Devil in Cell-Block D


Joined: 30 Jul 2004
Posts: 1999
Location: Toronto, Ontario

PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2014 12:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Francesco wrote:

Anyone could've written stories in which Matt was practicing law, albeit with some inconvenience given by his dual identity as superhero being more or less known (heck, since She-Hulk practices law even if she's big and green and flashy). Waid has suddenly decided it couldn't be done.


Just to add more mess to this thread I will point out that good "Matt as a Lawyer" stories are either rare or non-existent. I can't even think of the last time the courtroom or law aspect of a Daredevil story wasn't terrible. I guess the Nocenti stuff about the blind kid was cool but Matt wasn't even a lawyer then. Most of the courtroom stories have been awful.

That's the funny thing about Daredevil. When people who don't actually read the book talk about the character they say "he's a lawyer during the day and a vigilante at night! he rights the wrongs that happen in the day at night!". As though he tries to get a certain result in the day and then punches his way to justice at night when it doesn't work. I honestly can't remember the last time that actually happened in the comic. It was in the movie but it made no sense because he was a prosecutor or something?

Matt being a lawyer is a big part of the DD myth but a very, very, very tiny part of the actual story.
_________________
JC

So why can't you see the funny side?
Why aren't you laughing?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Francesco
Underboss


Joined: 08 Jun 2006
Posts: 1307

PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2014 1:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, Waid has made sure we won't see Matt practicing law for a while.
and actually quite a bit of storyarcs in the last twelve years involved that aspect of the character (playing to the camera, the murdock papers, that storyarc where big ben donovan was framed, the trial of the century, Out, without fear).

but now that I think about it, the whole point of moving to San Francisco was that it was the only other place where he could keep practicing law?
doesn't that contradict the whole point of him not being able to practice properly because of other lawyers bringing up the fact that he's DD?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
qtmxd
Playing to the Camera


Joined: 19 Sep 2010
Posts: 149

PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2014 1:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="james castle"]
Francesco wrote:


Matt being a lawyer is a big part of the DD myth but a very, very, very tiny part of the actual story.


As much as I disagree with James Castle on everything else, I think you're correct on this, though we draw different conclusions. DD is a superhero book, and the courtroom stories are generally poor. I don't even like stories where DD has to clear some innocent client of Matt's. But presumably Matt does a lot of things that we don't necessarily see him doing. We didn't see him in bed with women in every issue either, ( though more than most heroes... I used to like that, too, when it was a grown-up book), but that doesn't mean it isn't important. And it doesn't mean his being a lawyer isn't fundamental. When Miller devastated him by taking away his license, when Nocenti had him try to find a life without it, when Bendis and Brubaker had him fight to keep it against seemingly impossible odds, this was the parameter that made those stories so powerful. And the germ of it.... that Matt is a blind lawyer fighting in NYC's urban darkness... was there in Lee and Everett's #1, and an artistic idea strong enough to sustain him through 157 issues until Miller arrived and finally established the "true" DD.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jriddle
Playing to the Camera


Joined: 19 May 2011
Posts: 129

PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2014 2:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

humanaccident wrote:
jriddle -

There have been numerous times where Spidey has said he jokes when nervous, maybe I worded it wrong but thats what he does, the escape/release aspect is a bit true also though so I think we are both partly right on that.

Also I never saw DD being a release from day to day life for Matt, more a way to do good where he can't in his job, like its his way of operating within the system but also outside it? There have been numerous stories about how he almost sees himself as a different person with the mask on, so its not about releasing stress, its about doing good. Or am I misunderstanding?


My comments were about the earliest days of the character, in which Daredevil was written as a release for Matt from the troubles of his everyday life. The kind of depth of which you're speaking was added much later.


Last edited by jriddle on Mon Jul 14, 2014 2:48 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
jriddle
Playing to the Camera


Joined: 19 May 2011
Posts: 129

PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2014 2:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Francesco wrote:
As for the idea that Matt could no longer effectively practicing law because everyone was bringing up the fact he was suspected to be Daredevil, my friends, that was something that was just brutally and hamfistedly imposed by Waid.

Anyone could've written stories in which Matt was practicing law, albeit with some inconvenience given by his dual identity as superhero being more or less known (heck, since She-Hulk practices law even if she's big and green and flashy). Waid has suddenly decided it couldn't be done.


And, more generally, that's the way Waid handles everything when he's writing a book. If he wants things to go a certain way, he just decrees them to be so without regard for whether they make any sense, have any basis in the character or situation, etc. It's a point I was just making over in the "Losing Faith" thread in a slightly different context--Waid didn't push against the broad parameters of the DD world in order to mine that push for story material; he blew up and chucked those parameters because he had no interest in Daredevil and wanted to write a book that had no resemblance to it.


Last edited by jriddle on Mon Jul 14, 2014 3:56 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Nightwing2001
Flying Blind


Joined: 28 Feb 2011
Posts: 94
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2014 2:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I hate to be a broken record here, but I still don't understand what makes the Daredevil of issue 158 onwards the "true" version of Daredevil, while everything before it, not.

Yes the Miller version of the character is seen by most fans as the best version of all time, and with good reason. It was lightning in a bottle, a once in a lifetime thing. Other writers afterwards tried to emulate it and follow the same trail he blazed. Basically a "if it's not broken don't fix it mentality" to the comic. So instead of a few exceptions (like Kesel and Waid) that is the version we've mostly gotten and are used to seeing for nearly 3 decades. So a lot of fans want to continue to see that version now and find the Waid version too jarring and too much of a throwback to the pre 158 era. I get it. But when people say that everything before Miller's stuff wasn't the "real" or "true" version I'm not really seeing how they can back that up with anything other than their personal tastes and opinions and of something they are just used to seeing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jriddle
Playing to the Camera


Joined: 19 May 2011
Posts: 129

PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2014 3:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nightwing2001 wrote:
I hate to be a broken record here, but I still don't understand what makes the Daredevil of issue 158 onwards the "true" version of Daredevil, while everything before it, not.

Yes the Miller version of the character is seen by most fans as the best version of all time, and with good reason. It was lightning in a bottle, a once in a lifetime thing. Other writers afterwards tried to emulate it and follow the same trail he blazed. Basically a "if it's not broken don't fix it mentality" to the comic. So instead of a few exceptions (like Kesel and Waid) that is the version we've mostly gotten and are used to seeing for nearly 3 decades. So a lot of fans want to continue to see that version now and find the Waid version too jarring and too much of a throwback to the pre 158 era. I get it. But when people say that everything before Miller's stuff wasn't the "real" or "true" version I'm not really seeing how they can back that up with anything other than their personal tastes and opinions and of something they are just used to seeing.


Daredevil found its soul and its unique voice with Miller. Pieces of that had been with it right from the start and scattered throughout its history; Miller is the one who saw the potential and put it all together. As already noted (a few times), the talk of "real" and "true" is mostly caricature aimed at avoiding any real engagement with the subject. Nearly all of the Marvel characters went through a period before they found their own niche. DD just took longer than the others.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
qtmxd
Playing to the Camera


Joined: 19 Sep 2010
Posts: 149

PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2014 4:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

jriddle wrote:
Nightwing2001 wrote:
I hate to be a broken record here, but I still don't understand what makes the Daredevil of issue 158 onwards the "true" version of Daredevil, while everything before it, not.

Yes the Miller version of the character is seen by most fans as the best version of all time, and with good reason. It was lightning in a bottle, a once in a lifetime thing. Other writers afterwards tried to emulate it and follow the same trail he blazed. Basically a "if it's not broken don't fix it mentality" to the comic. So instead of a few exceptions (like Kesel and Waid) that is the version we've mostly gotten and are used to seeing for nearly 3 decades. So a lot of fans want to continue to see that version now and find the Waid version too jarring and too much of a throwback to the pre 158 era. I get it. But when people say that everything before Miller's stuff wasn't the "real" or "true" version I'm not really seeing how they can back that up with anything other than their personal tastes and opinions and of something they are just used to seeing.


Daredevil found its soul and its unique voice with Miller. Pieces of that had been with it right from the start and scattered throughout its history; Miller is the one who saw the potential and put it all together. As already noted (a few times), the talk of "real" and "true" is mostly caricature aimed at avoiding any real engagement with the subject. Nearly all of the Marvel characters went through a period before they found their own niche. DD just took longer than the others.

Again, you can like who you like, but this notion that Miller was once in a lifetime? Almost every subsequent writer... Nocenti, Chichester, Smith, Mack, Bendis, Brubaker retained Milller's DD, pushing parameters, putting him in different situations, street, fantasy, and sf, some of which worked well, others not, but keeping the same serious man. So, no, Miller established the noir DD, but was not unique at all. But if you genuinely like the other DD of Kesel, Gale, and Waid, you've got it.
Back in the day, there was a proposal for a DD cartoon series, where he would fight crime with his dog, Lightning. I can imagine the defenses.... everything's a fantasy anyway, Squirrel Girl has pets too, it's a breath of fresh air!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MarcWagz
Flying Blind


Joined: 16 Jan 2008
Posts: 83

PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2014 9:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

born again is the best storyline, and miller gets props for it, but for having Daredevil try and kill bullseye and be happy about it later on kind of wrecked the character. Later authors were able to blend Millers daredevil with the lighter Matt of before hand, which is why brubakers arc was my favorite, in light of all the serious stuff happening, Matt is still his old, humourous self.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Francesco
Underboss


Joined: 08 Jun 2006
Posts: 1307

PostPosted: Wed Jul 16, 2014 9:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Matt was never happy about having tried to kill bullseye, and this was shown by Miller himself in a subsequent issue, the one titled "Roulette". If you haven't read that, you should.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MikeMurdock
Flying Blind


Joined: 08 May 2014
Posts: 6

PostPosted: Tue Jul 29, 2014 10:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am glad to see this thread exists., I’m a relative new comer to Daredevil only really giving him a chance in the last few years. Doing so made me fall in love with the character. I haven’t read all of it, but the Miller, Bendis and Brubaker stuff are my personal favorites and made for some of the best comic reading I’ve ever experienced. I came to Daredevil because my love for both pulp and film noir, it seemed like a perfect fit. Over the weekend I ran through all of the Waid stuff on Volume 3 for the first time. I applaud his effort to really change it up and brighten up the edges of what had been a very dark world for Matt Murdock.

With that said it wasn’t appealing to me. It was certainly fine just not my cup of tea. There were some aspects I did enjoy and I actually think that storyline with Bullseye, Lady Bullseye and Ikari or on par with any of the classic stuff. The rest, not so much. I don’t know if I could directly pinpoint what it was that I didn’t like but one thing I do know about those previous runs I mentioned stick out. Matt Murdock the character was almost more interesting to me then Daredevil (especially in Born Again and Bendis stuff). With Waid’s current run, I don’t seem to have any interest in Murdock or really care about him at all. He’s just kind of there as a function to further the story along.

I’ll probably continue to buy the issues as they come out, but whoever said there will likely be a sea change in the book when the show comes out I think may be right. Waid might not be ousted as writer but I think he may have to get a little darker…
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Daredevil Message Board Forum Index -> The comics All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 11, 12, 13  Next
Page 12 of 13

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group