View previous topic :: View next topic |
Is Andy Diggle the worst DD writer ever? |
Yes |
|
40% |
[ 10 ] |
No |
|
60% |
[ 15 ] |
|
Total Votes : 25 |
|
Author |
Message |
Francesco Underboss
Joined: 08 Jun 2006 Posts: 1307
|
Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 9:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Foggy's Pal wrote: | Francesco wrote: | Leaving the book with a great change doesn't imply being a good writer. |
You're right, but the change was significant and should have been explored more thoroughly. Nothing interesting was done with Matt leading the Hand. |
The point still stands. Writing a big change upon leaving the book doesn't make you a good writer.
What's done next with it doesn't matter. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kentuckydevil Flying Blind
Joined: 19 Jul 2009 Posts: 79
|
Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 10:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i don't think diggle was/is the worst ever...however he has presided over some of the worse characterizations and conceptual ideas in the heroes history.
I go way back..I remember the man-bull story lines..the fake hippy psychic..etc from the early 70s...
for the record I actually enjoyed brubakers run..especially the return of the king...however everything pales in comparison to miller, which I still have his entire original run from the day i bought them,..and bendis was absolutely brilliant...
However I hope diggle leaves soon...will never trust him again on DD..marvel owes it to us to bring in a team much as DC has with detective..something special to set the ship straight... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Minion Flying Blind

Joined: 05 Mar 2010 Posts: 62
|
Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2010 5:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
I can't rightly say as I've never read most of the other writers. He is definitely the worst that I have read. The first arc was quite good but after that it fell apart in a major way to the point that by the end of Shadowland I was actively angry about the disrespect shown to the characters and the totally cliche dialogue from every villain. And the single thing that I thought may be interesting coming out of Shadowland, Typhoid Mary's loyalty to Matt and her taking over leadership of the Hand, and threw it out of the way by having the Kingpin magic his way into her brain.
And I don't get the Brubaker Hate that's going on in this thread I loved his entire run, but I didn't read it in issues. I read the Omnibuses. Maybe it read differently in issues. _________________ Random Insanity since.... Ummmmm... Tuesday? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Darkdevil Humanity's Fathom

Joined: 04 Apr 2009 Posts: 331 Location: The Bright, Sunny South
|
Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2010 7:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Francesco wrote: | Foggy's Pal wrote: | Francesco wrote: | Leaving the book with a great change doesn't imply being a good writer. |
You're right, but the change was significant and should have been explored more thoroughly. Nothing interesting was done with Matt leading the Hand. |
The point still stands. Writing a big change upon leaving the book doesn't make you a good writer.
What's done next with it doesn't matter. |
By that logic, Bendis was a poor writer then.
And the change does matter if the incoming writer is able to build upon it to tell good stories with consistent characterization.
Halfway through Fall from Grace and I'm not seeing what's wrong with Chichester. His story and dialogue are good. And no, I haven't read his full run then or now, but so far, I have little issue with his work.
As for McDaniel's art, I've seen worse but between the coloring and inking, I like the dynamic of it. His panel layout was very good as well. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Foggy's Pal Playing to the Camera
Joined: 12 May 2010 Posts: 106 Location: BEHIND MY DESK
|
Posted: Fri Dec 24, 2010 10:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Darkdevil wrote: | Francesco wrote: | Foggy's Pal wrote: | Francesco wrote: | Leaving the book with a great change doesn't imply being a good writer. |
You're right, but the change was significant and should have been explored more thoroughly. Nothing interesting was done with Matt leading the Hand. |
The point still stands. Writing a big change upon leaving the book doesn't make you a good writer.
What's done next with it doesn't matter. |
By that logic, Bendis was a poor writer then.
And the change does matter if the incoming writer is able to build upon it to tell good stories with consistent characterization.
Halfway through Fall from Grace and I'm not seeing what's wrong with Chichester. His story and dialogue are good. And no, I haven't read his full run then or now, but so far, I have little issue with his work.
As for McDaniel's art, I've seen worse but between the coloring and inking, I like the dynamic of it. His panel layout was very good as well. |
No, that does not mean Bendis was a bad writer. It simply means that leaving Matt in jail does not make him a good writer. He proved himself long before then. What his point means, in return, is that Brubaker is a good writer because he took those circumstances and made a great story. Bru left Matt in charge of the hand and Diggle told a horrible story. That was his point, I think. Well, at least, that's how I looked at it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Francesco Underboss
Joined: 08 Jun 2006 Posts: 1307
|
Posted: Fri Dec 24, 2010 10:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Exactly. Bendis was a good writer because he wrote damn good stories.
The fact that he left the book with a great change (Matt in jail) is not what makes him a good DD writer. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
james castle Devil in Cell-Block D
Joined: 30 Jul 2004 Posts: 1999 Location: Toronto, Ontario
|
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 3:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'd vote Smith for the worst which is saying something because even though DD has a proud tradition of having some really great writers do some really great work on the book he has an equally proud tradition of having really bad writers do some really bad work on the book. Smith wins, however, for the ridiculous Karen kill.
I don't get all the Chichester hate. He clearly got a little too experimental in the end but he also did some classics - Last Rites for example. _________________ JC
So why can't you see the funny side?
Why aren't you laughing? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
thecolorsblend Flying Blind
Joined: 10 Jan 2011 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 3:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've only been reading Daredevil for about a year so I'll be the first to admit that I don't have quite the investment in the character that the rest of you seem to.
That said, when a writer does anything, the question I always ask myself is "was the story entertaining?" and "do the characters' actions make sense given the plot and given their interaction with other characters?".
I therefore enjoyed the Bendis and Brubaker runs. My main beef with Diggle (and maybe this is more of a nitpick) is not so much that Matt killed Bullseye. It's more that he killed Bullseye when he did; not after Elektra died, not after Karen Page died, not after any of a number of atrocities Bullseye has committed.
We're to believe that Matt was a responsible moral agent for his choice as his decision to kill Bullseye is what allowed him to be fully possessed in the first place.
I can believe that Daredevil would want to or just flat out WOULD kill Bullseye. But I just can't quite convince myself that he'd choose that moment of all times to cross that line. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Darkdevil Humanity's Fathom

Joined: 04 Apr 2009 Posts: 331 Location: The Bright, Sunny South
|
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 7:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Foggy's Pal wrote: | What his point means, in return, is that Brubaker is a good writer because he took those circumstances and made a great story. Bru left Matt in charge of the hand and Diggle told a horrible story. That was his point, I think. Well, at least, that's how I looked at it. |
Exactly. Using the elements given to him, Brubaker crafted a very good story, maybe not up to or equal to his Capt. America stories, but still of high quality. He left the character in a more exciting, surprising, and fresh situation than Bendis had left for him. Diggle dropped the ball, from what I understand to be too heavy mandates from Editorial. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Wheelie Flying Blind
Joined: 10 Feb 2011 Posts: 37
|
Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 11:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It is hard to answer 'no' to this question.
Other writers have stunk on DD before, but this was the first time DD was completely mistreated like a cheap whore.
He was made a villain in his own book, in his own event, used as an excuse to attract Marvel fanboys wanting to see Spidey, Wolverine, and Punisher beat up ninjas.
The whole experience seemed dirty. DD was used and abused.
Diggle can maybe be excused if Shadowland was really the brainchild of Quesada or Bendis and Marvel-mandated. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
james castle Devil in Cell-Block D
Joined: 30 Jul 2004 Posts: 1999 Location: Toronto, Ontario
|
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2011 2:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just finished Shadowland and I would like to change my vote to "yes". I came into Shadowland with comically low expectations but it was much, much worse than I ever thought. Horrible idea executed in a horrible way. I can't believe they pay this guy to write comics. _________________ JC
So why can't you see the funny side?
Why aren't you laughing? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Nightwing2001 Flying Blind

Joined: 28 Feb 2011 Posts: 94 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 1:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have to say nothing can beat Kevin Smith as the worst DD writer, but after reading Shadowland, Andy Diggle is a very close second. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
james castle Devil in Cell-Block D
Joined: 30 Jul 2004 Posts: 1999 Location: Toronto, Ontario
|
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 2:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nightwing2001 wrote: | I have to say nothing can beat Kevin Smith as the worst DD writer, but after reading Shadowland, Andy Diggle is a very close second. |
But, I take from your other post that you haven't read the Shadowland mini yet. Daredevil: Shadowland is horrible but Shadowland is so, so, so much worse. _________________ JC
So why can't you see the funny side?
Why aren't you laughing? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Styleshift Flying Blind

Joined: 03 Apr 2011 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 11:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
I can't vote without actually having read every run of DD.
I don't think Diggle is a bad writer. I've dug what I've read from Reborn. (Although it should be in the actual comic and not a mini.)
But yes, Shadowland was bad.
Good execution, but it was still a bad plot.
I like to compare it to emerald twilight From Green Lantern.
But that story gave birth to Kyle Rayner who is arguably a more interesting character than Hal Jordan.
Shadowland didn't really do anything for anybody.
Except further distance Matt from his friends and remove him from his position of leader of the hand (and with it all story telling potential Brubaker left with it.)
They've basically Civil war'd/OMD'd Daredevil here except the consequences of his choices have stuck. Which is good if it goes somewhere.
I think SL truly suffered from being hyped up and DD usually avoids that mess for classic story telling. That's my two cents anyways. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Daredevil24 Humanity's Fathom
Joined: 06 Apr 2011 Posts: 367
|
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2011 4:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
one of the worst but not the worse |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|