Daredevil Message Board
The Board Without Fear!
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The Message Board is currently in read-only mode, as the software is now out of date. Several features and pages have been removed. If/When I get time I intend to re-launch the board with updated software.


Daredevil: Battling Jack Murdock #2
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Daredevil Message Board Forum Index -> The comics
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
pbblair
Flying Blind


Joined: 24 Nov 2005
Posts: 37

PostPosted: Sat Jul 14, 2007 5:27 pm    Post subject: Daredevil: Battling Jack Murdock #2 Reply with quote

Thoughts?

Other than having a deep-seeded dislike of retcons, mine are the following:

1- What's with the chronology? This issue seems to jump ahead 10 years or so, but Matt's dad references the letter from Maggie although it's new. And that's it for Maggie, huh? A bit disappointing.

2-Stick sure spends a lot of time at Josie's.

3-DD:Father sure ruined the scene with Matt saving the blind man, huh? Now that I know that he's a child-molester that raises a serial killer, that is.

4-With his dad being such a jerk and a loser, why does Matt even care if he wins the match?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
james castle
Devil in Cell-Block D


Joined: 30 Jul 2004
Posts: 1999
Location: Toronto, Ontario

PostPosted: Sat Jul 14, 2007 5:41 pm    Post subject: Re: Daredevil: Battling Jack Murdock #2 Reply with quote

pbblair wrote:

3-DD:Father sure ruined the scene with Matt saving the blind man, huh? Now that I know that he's a child-molester that raises a serial killer, that is.


Is this honestly how DD:Father ends? How is that not the most insane thing in the world? Didn't Joey Q write this as a tribute to his father? What the hell? So glad I skipped it.
_________________
JC

So why can't you see the funny side?
Why aren't you laughing?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
the truebeliever
Flying Blind


Joined: 04 Jul 2006
Posts: 80
Location: Starke, Florida

PostPosted: Sun Jul 15, 2007 11:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah, I too hated the ending of DD: Father. It was total bs.

I'm probaly going to wait till Battlin' Jack comes to trade. And now after hearing this I'm happy I am. Thanks pbblair for the heads up.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Isaac
Flying Blind


Joined: 05 May 2006
Posts: 39
Location: Cordoba, Spain

PostPosted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mmm... i don't know what you mean, but I've liked it. I was sceptic about the unknown writer and about the artist, since I didn't like his work on Dylan Dog, but I must say I've been impressed so far. But after things like DD:Father (which I did not dislike, for the lapses between issues prevented me from understanding a thing), I think it's logical to be ready for the worst at any DD mini.
I liked it. And so far it's about Jack Murdock. Impressive.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Forrest
Lowlife


Joined: 07 Dec 2004
Posts: 1439

PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 10:43 am    Post subject: Re: Daredevil: Battling Jack Murdock #2 Reply with quote

pbblair wrote:

4-With his dad being such a jerk and a loser, why does Matt even care if he wins the match?


...Really? A "jerk and a loser," eh? No, Maggie, Matt's mother is a jerk and a loser. Jack, on the other hand, is a prize fighter doing everything he possibly can to give Matt a better life. If he weren't thinking of Matt, he would have remained a drunk, never would have confronted the Fixer and Matt may very well have ended up an old drunk as well. Jack has spirit and he's a fighter, something this story has done a great job illustrating so far. (And his mother is an irresponsible loser. Razz)

I was also happy to see the DD: Father lore fit in here. In fact, I have been quite impressed with the respect that has been paid to existing DD lore. (BTW, I thought DD: Father was outstanding! So what if Matt saved a child molester? As DD, he saved Bullseye from a train. Heroes save people, even bad people. If you don't like that, stick to Punisher comics.)

As with the first issue, I LOVED #2! I don't think this could have been put together much better!
_________________
"Flash is back. Worlds will die again!"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Clayton Blind Love
Redemption


Joined: 30 Jul 2004
Posts: 772
Location: Beautiful British Columbia

PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 5:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I was a fan of DD: Father. It wasn't the greatest, but the last two issues really made up for it. It is not like Matt can tell he is saving a good person or a bad person sometimes and I thought this was an interesting aspect on his origin story. Sometimes the stranger that you cross pathes with (in this case, saving) ends up coming back in your future indirectly or directly for better or worse. This reminds me a little of Saving Private Ryan when the platoon ends up sparing that German's life only for him to come back later and kill some of them. Good deeds do not always spawn good results.

C.
_________________
Love is blindness, I don't want to see
Won't you wrap the night around me
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
james castle
Devil in Cell-Block D


Joined: 30 Jul 2004
Posts: 1999
Location: Toronto, Ontario

PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 6:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

But the whole thing just smacks of "oh yeah, that's girl Matt pushed out the window? that's Typhoid Mary!!!!". I can't wait until it turns out that the guy driving the truck was Stick's Dad! Yeah!

Way, way back (and I know this is hard to believe) Marvel made a name for itself by making superheros more real. That Spider-Man guy was also Peter Parker who was just a normal kid trying to deal with being a superhero and the rest of his life. Stuff like this just makes it all one big circus.
_________________
JC

So why can't you see the funny side?
Why aren't you laughing?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Francesco
Underboss


Joined: 08 Jun 2006
Posts: 1307

PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 6:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I could accept the fact that the guy Matt saved as a youngster was in fact a child abuser.
Like Clayton said, it is not like Matt can tell he is saving a good person or a bad person. Even if he could, that would mean nothing. He saved a person. That's what makes him a hero.

That said, the thing stinks because -that- is presented as the whole point of the miniseries, when actually, if you think about it, it's no big deal.

And it's a kind of overused plot device, nowadays. Sexual abuse. Really there was nothing else. DD/Matt didn't do anything heroic in the end. Maggie got shot by error by the FBI guys, Matt didn't realize till the end that Sean Farrel was the victim, not the culprit (and beside that, he didn't even notice he was dying, so much for Rader Sense + hypersenses). He just went to confront a blind, crippled old geezer, for no logical reason, if not the fictional one of attempting to give a significant ending to the miniseries.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
harryhausen
Playing to the Camera


Joined: 20 Apr 2007
Posts: 129
Location: U$A

PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 11:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I’ve been liking Battlin’ Jack, myself. It’s kind of low-key, but I think it’s nice that way. I’ll admit that the ‘cameos’ are a bit overdone (esp. young Turk), but it’s campy in a way that doesn’t cross the line (yet). I think it’s nice to see some of the backstory portrayed like this and I hope that a new reason for not throwing the fight is provided. If it’s just honor and whatnot, it’s still cool, but would seem an odd choice (knowing that he’ll be killed and abandon a blind Matt he considers weak). Maybe some new detail will enrich that choice for Jack.

I’ll also admit that I found the scenes with Jack and baby Matt to be pretty touching. Having an infant you didn’t know about dumped on you by your lost love who had flipped out and become a nun would be a heavy load for anyone, but in Jack’s position, I think it bespeaks a real effort on his part to do the right thing through this.

I also dig how this emphasizes the real blue-collar nature of Matt’s upbringing. That seems to be lost a little bit with certain writers, but Matt is born into some of the same circumstances that stereotypically yield offenders, yet he comes through it determined to be just the opposite – in both of his roles. In light of so many heroes who come from the Silver Spoon Set (Stark, Wayne, Worthington, Queen, etc.), it’s nice to see the other side of the coin so richly portrayed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
james castle
Devil in Cell-Block D


Joined: 30 Jul 2004
Posts: 1999
Location: Toronto, Ontario

PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 12:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

For me this mini-series doesn't even exist so maybe I shouldn't be commenting on it. That said:

harryhausen wrote:
I hope that a new reason for not throwing the fight is provided. If it’s just honor and whatnot, it’s still cool, but would seem an odd choice (knowing that he’ll be killed and abandon a blind Matt he considers weak). Maybe some new detail will enrich that choice for Jack.


Sweet mother of god don't let there be a "new" reason provided. Absolutely no new reason is needed. Jack decided to do the right thing and make his son pround. End of story. If there's another "interesting" piece added it just weakens the whole thing.

harryhausen wrote:

lost love who had flipped out and become a nun


Can someone explain this to me? So Maggie hooks up with Jack and has a baby. Then she feels guilty and dumps the baby on Jack and becomes a nun. Is it just me or does this make no sense? She becomes a nun because she feels guilty? About what? About ditching her kid? But she only ditches her kid to become a nun. If she didn't ditch her kid to become a nun she wouldn't feel guilty about ditching her kid and therefore wouldn't have to become a nun because she wouldn't have ditched her kid...what?

Or does she just feel guilty about having a kid? So guilty that she about faces into becoming a nun (even though that means ditching her kid?). So she does a worse thing (ditching her kid) as a way for making up for a smaller thing (having a kid)? What?

I honestly can't see my way around this without it being crap.

As far as I'm concerned Jack hooked up with a nun. That nun had Matt. Jack raised Matt because the nun couldn't. That's clearly what Miller intended and clearly makes way more sense.
_________________
JC

So why can't you see the funny side?
Why aren't you laughing?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Francesco
Underboss


Joined: 08 Jun 2006
Posts: 1307

PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 12:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

What is that? The "nun's paradox"?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Forrest
Lowlife


Joined: 07 Dec 2004
Posts: 1439

PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 1:17 pm    Post subject: Re: Daredevil: Battling Jack Murdock #2 Reply with quote

pbblair wrote:
Thoughts?

Other than having a deep-seeded dislike of retcons [. . .]


...but there are no retcons in Battlin' Jack #1 and #2...
_________________
"Flash is back. Worlds will die again!"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Forrest
Lowlife


Joined: 07 Dec 2004
Posts: 1439

PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 1:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

james castle wrote:

Can someone explain this to me? So Maggie hooks up with Jack and has a baby. Then she feels guilty and dumps the baby on Jack and becomes a nun. Is it just me or does this make no sense? She becomes a nun because she feels guilty? About what? About ditching her kid? But she only ditches her kid to become a nun. If she didn't ditch her kid to become a nun she wouldn't feel guilty about ditching her kid and therefore wouldn't have to become a nun because she wouldn't have ditched her kid...what?

Or does she just feel guilty about having a kid? So guilty that she about faces into becoming a nun (even though that means ditching her kid?). So she does a worse thing (ditching her kid) as a way for making up for a smaller thing (having a kid)? What?

I honestly can't see my way around this without it being crap.

As far as I'm concerned Jack hooked up with a nun. That nun had Matt. Jack raised Matt because the nun couldn't. That's clearly what Miller intended and clearly makes way more sense.


You confusion confuses me. She was just a Catholic who felt guilty about premartial sex, dropped her responsibility and essentially left Matt to the wolves. She is not a responsible person --> very bad parent. It's not complex.

I get the feeling you hate this story because you want to hate it. Have you read either issue, yet?

Also, why do you think Miller intended that Jack knocked up a nun? I see no evidence of this over Maggie becoming a nun, after the fact.
_________________
"Flash is back. Worlds will die again!"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
james castle
Devil in Cell-Block D


Joined: 30 Jul 2004
Posts: 1999
Location: Toronto, Ontario

PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 1:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Forrest wrote:

You confusion confuses me. She was just a Catholic who felt guilty about premartial sex, dropped her responsibility and essentially left Matt to the wolves. She is not a responsible person --> very bad parent. It's not complex.


But what's the time line here? When does the guilt show up? And why does she become a nun? I just don't see how it all ties together. I accept that (according to this mini) she's not a responsible person and is a very bad parent but how does she goes from that to nun? Does it go like this:

1. She's Catholic.
2. She has the sex.
3. She has the baby.
4. She abandons the baby.
5. Guilt.
6. Nun.

Or is it:

1. She's Catholic.
2. She has the sex.
3. She has the baby.
4. Guilt.
5. She abandons the baby to become a
6. Nun.

I just don't get it.

Forrest wrote:

I get the feeling you hate this story because you want to hate it. Have you read either issue, yet?


Well, no. But, why would I "want to hate it"? On one hand I couldn't care less. On the other hand I'm a huge fan of good DD stories. I have no agenda regarding bashing DD minis just for the hell of it. I do admit, however, that this Maggie as harlet/guilty nun thing bugs me.

Forrest wrote:

Also, why do you think Miller intended that Jack knocked up a nun? I see no evidence of this over Maggie becoming a nun, after the fact.


Mainly just because of how Maggie reacts to Matt in Born Again. She seeks him out when he's blinded and clearly has some weird hidden love for him. It makes sense if she's a nun first because she's torn because she loves Matt but can't be with him because she's nunned up.. It doesn't make sense the other way around. If she really wanted to be with Matt why would she nun it up? I'm not Catholic but surely abandoning your child is worse than pre-marital sex. Just doesn't make sense.
_________________
JC

So why can't you see the funny side?
Why aren't you laughing?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Forrest
Lowlife


Joined: 07 Dec 2004
Posts: 1439

PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 4:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

james castle wrote:
Does it go like this:

1. She's Catholic.
2. She has the sex.
3. She has the baby.
4. She abandons the baby.
5. Guilt.
6. Nun.

Or is it:

1. She's Catholic.
2. She has the sex.
3. She has the baby.
4. Guilt.
5. She abandons the baby to become a
6. Nun.

I just don't get it.


It's the later case. She is feeling quite guilty when she drops infant Matt at Jack's doorstep. Also, she knows where Jack lives (obviously) and could find Matt and become a good parent at any point.

james castle wrote:
I do admit, however, that this Maggie as harlet/guilty nun thing bugs me.


Sure but it is very logical. E.g. Why was she never there for him while Jack lived for him?

Before this mini, the only way I could justify Sister Maggie being a good person (in my opinion) is if she was not really Matt's mother. (Hence, my DD:Father speculation that we might learn that Maggie is not Matt's real mother. Of course, that didn't happen.) Now that we know for sure that Sister Maggie is Matt's mother, I really don't see why we should feel compelled to view her in an entirely positive light. She has moral/psychological problems and she is irresponsible.

james castle wrote:
Forrest wrote:

Also, why do you think Miller intended that Jack knocked up a nun? I see no evidence of this over Maggie becoming a nun, after the fact.


Mainly just because of how Maggie reacts to Matt in Born Again. She seeks him out when he's blinded and clearly has some weird hidden love for him. It makes sense if she's a nun first because she's torn because she loves Matt but can't be with him because she's nunned up.. It doesn't make sense the other way around.


Sure it does. Years have past since Matt's birth, she's grown and gotten wiser with age. She loves her child who she abandoned as an infant. (--> "weird hidden love") She's torn because she knowingly abandoned Matt due to her guilt and told herself the right thing to do would be repent, serve God as a nun and never look back. If she embraces Matt and becomes his mother again, for her, that may feel like embracing her sin and consequently abandoning her service to God.

james castle wrote:
If she really wanted to be with Matt why would she nun it up? I'm not Catholic but surely abandoning your child is worse than pre-marital sex. Just doesn't make sense.


Well, to her it did. She was probably so disturbed by her sin that she felt the only way to escape guilt was by erasing Matt from her life, pretending she is still a virgin and making sure she never commits the same sin again --> become a nun. Purity through selective memory and lies. It happens all the time.
_________________
"Flash is back. Worlds will die again!"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Daredevil Message Board Forum Index -> The comics All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 1 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group