|
Daredevil Message Board The Board Without Fear!
|
The Message Board is currently in read-only mode, as the software is now out of date. Several features and pages have been removed. If/When I get time I intend to re-launch the board with updated software.
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
jriddle Playing to the Camera
Joined: 19 May 2011 Posts: 129
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The Overlord Paradiso
Joined: 22 Aug 2004 Posts: 1095
|
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 3:58 pm Post subject: Re: Daredevil #6 First Look |
|
|
Actually this is not just Waid's idea, its a giant a crossover that Marvel is doing where a bunch of characters have dark secrets revealed. Its kinda unfair to lay the blame solely at his feet, when Marvel is doing something similar to almost all of their characters.
Also as a side note, its going to be hard to dismiss Waid's run as just a dream, if DD is taking part in a major crossover that affects everyone. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jriddle Playing to the Camera
Joined: 19 May 2011 Posts: 129
|
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 6:27 pm Post subject: Re: Daredevil #6 First Look |
|
|
Waid has Matt smearing mud over the part of his father's tombstone that says "A Good Man." Waid is the author, here; it's his name on the solicitation, just as it's been his name on the book for over three years now.
Matt has always been his father's son. "Dad. He was the greatest." The basic decency, the pride, the drive to never quit--it's all Jack Murdock. "The measure of a man is not in how he gets knocked down to the mat; it's in how he gets up." Fogwell's Gym has been treated, in Daredevil, as practically a religious shrine. Battlin' Jack was human and did things, at times, of which he was not proud. Matt knows this, understands this, and has unconditionally loved him anyway, warts and all, and never judged him. Times were hard and his father did the best he could, and wanted better for his son. All of this is a part of DD's story that has been with him from the beginning, through every iteration. It was there when the book had very little in the way of an unique soul and it's been reinforced by every writer who has worked on the character at any length since Frank Miller gave it one.
Screwing with that is something that would provoke pretty much universal outrage of a fairly substantial nature among actual DD fans, regardless of who was manning the screw.
In the context of Waid's run, it comes after years in which Waid has gone out of his way to strip every bit of Daredevil from Daredevil until there's virtually nothing left, and now he's going into the past to try to take this from DD as well. More of Waid's standard shock-value gimmicks because--as usual--he's incapable of selling a book without them.
Disgraceful. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jriddle Playing to the Camera
Joined: 19 May 2011 Posts: 129
|
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 6:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Something I wrote here in the "Future of Daredevil" thread only 12 days ago: "Virtually every DD writer for 4 decades prior to Waid--good writers, bad writers, and every other writer--has stressed that element of the character, Matt as his father's son. No one who has read DD for any length of time at all (except perhaps Waid's DD) has missed that constant theme..."
And now, only days later, that awful preview of #6 and the revelation that Waid is going to be allowed to screw with even this. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
james castle Devil in Cell-Block D
Joined: 30 Jul 2004 Posts: 1999 Location: Toronto, Ontario
|
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2014 9:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
1. It's a four page preview with no dialogue. Sure, the smear seems to speak for itself but maybe we could wait for, I dunno, the rest of the comic or at least the rest of the page (i.e. the dialogue) before passing judgment.
2. Anyone who has actually read any Daredevil knows that Matt has a very conflicted relationship with his father. His father used to beat him. Part of the reason Matt became a lawyer was because he knew that was wrong. Matt promised not to fight and then secretly broke that promise while his father was alive and continues to do so. I have my doubts about the whole Original Sin thing but I don't think a writer exploring the complex relationship between Matt and his parents is a bad thing.
3. jriddle again exposes what he's actually after here by referring to "actual" Daredevil fans. I find it hilarious that someone who doesn't read the book and has only read it off and one for the last few decades holds himself up to be an "actual" fan.
4. Aren't we at the point where jriddle is just trolling? _________________ JC
So why can't you see the funny side?
Why aren't you laughing? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Francesco Underboss
Joined: 08 Jun 2006 Posts: 1307
|
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2014 9:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
they're just a few panels with no dialogue, it's premature to make anything out of them.
They show Matt being angry at his father for something.
No big deal if you ask me. People have both good and bad memories of relatives and friends who have passed away.
And Matt's father has done good and bad things in his life. He cared for Matt, he loved him, but sometimes he was drunk, he used to beat him up, forbade him to go play with the other kids. But most of all he never said the whole truth about Matt's mom.
Matt is well aware of this. I can recall another instance of Matt being angry at the memory of his father, it was at the beginning of Brubaker's run, with Matt hallucinating while in prison. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dimetre Underboss
Joined: 16 Feb 2006 Posts: 1366 Location: Toronto
|
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2014 11:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
I pretty much agree with everything james castle and Francesco have typed. But I'll just add that, while I rarely enjoy crossover events, Original Sin has been a lot of fun so far. It's allowing characters throughout Marvel to be confronted with secrets they, until now, haven't been privy to. Obviously, because of events, Matt has found out something about his father he never knew before, and it's not good. Nothing wrong with this. Obviously jriddle isn't reading Original Sin either. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
train Guardian Devil
Joined: 29 Jul 2004 Posts: 659 Location: Hell's Pantry
|
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2014 5:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
james castle wrote: | Aren't we at the point where jriddle is just trolling? |
I think we passed that point about a week ago. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jriddle Playing to the Camera
Joined: 19 May 2011 Posts: 129
|
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 2:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
james castle wrote: | 1. It's a four page preview with no dialogue. Sure, the smear seems to speak for itself but maybe we could wait for, I dunno, the rest of the comic or at least the rest of the page (i.e. the dialogue) before passing judgment. |
It's Matt smearing mud over "A Good Man"--in effect, spitting on his father's grave. So no, if we're to assume Matt isn't completely out of his mind--and the rest of the preview would seem to refute that--it isn't too early to have an opinion on this latest outrageous development.
james castle wrote: | 2. Anyone who has actually read any Daredevil knows that Matt has a very conflicted relationship with his father. |
Matt's "very conflicted relationship with his father" amounted to finding it a hassle that he was made to study so much when he's rather be goofing off. Those who have "actually read" Daredevil can't help but notice that Matt's expressed love for his father has always bordered on the worshipful, that Jack is the one who imbued Matt with most of the things that made him a good man, that one of Matt's thoughts expressed over and over again throughout the canon is his hope that his father would be proud of him. It wasn't some "conflicted relationship" that led a blind man to dress as a devil and throw himself into insane amounts of danger to avenge the man and to make illicit war on the kind of corruption that destroyed the man. Jack loved his son more than anything--that's what we see of him over and over again. He raised Matt alone from childhood, had nothing but worked himself to the bone for Matt, eventually worked in fixed fights for Matt's sake (so Matt could stay in school), and he didn't take a dive in his final fight because of Matt, which got him killed, and that is not a man on whose grave Matt spits.
If you find that preview sequence in any way reasonable or in character or anything less than outrageous, the only question that remains is whether your view is born of a severe lack of familiarity with the canon or is simply uninformed by any semblance of logic.
(To note the obvious, Waid's entire point in writing something like that then Marvel releasing it as a preview is Waid's standard shock-tactic gimmickry. It's meant to outrage and fan controversy in the hopes of increasing sales. He does it constantly and on every book on which he works.)
james castle wrote: | His father used to beat him. Part of the reason Matt became a lawyer was because he knew that was wrong. |
His father slapped him once when he was young. It was an incident created by Frank Miller to show why Matt chose law as his profession. In context, Jack Murdock had always been adamant that his son would have a better life than he'd had, that Matt would be of some respected profession, not some street brawler, and getting into fights was absolutely forbidden. Matt got into a fight and came home quite pleased with himself while Jack was drunk. It broke Jack's heart and he clipped him, then was immediately horrified by it--the only time anything like that ever happened. It has never diminished Matt's expressed love and respect for his father.
james castle wrote: | 3. jriddle again exposes what he's actually after here by referring to "actual" Daredevil fans. I find it hilarious that someone who doesn't read the book and has only read it off and one for the last few decades holds himself up to be an "actual" fan. |
As already noted, the entire point of the moments in the preview and of its release is to create controversy among Daredevil fans. As for my reading of DD, I appear to be the second-oldest fellow here and the likelihood is that I've been reading DD since before you were a twinkle in your father's eye--there is, to date, very little I haven't read.
james castle wrote: | 4. Aren't we at the point where jriddle is just trolling? |
I can certainly understand why you find it so much easier to throw out something like that than to deal with what I write, but the equivalent of "you're a mean poopy-head" isn't exactly going to impress anyone as a substantive refutation. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
james castle Devil in Cell-Block D
Joined: 30 Jul 2004 Posts: 1999 Location: Toronto, Ontario
|
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 4:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jriddle wrote: |
I can certainly understand why you find it so much easier to throw out something like that than to deal with what I write, but the equivalent of "you're a mean poopy-head" isn't exactly going to impress anyone as a substantive refutation. |
You have been refuted, repeatedly, by myself and others. You just refuse to hear it. You're creating multiple threads with the same general theme - Waid sucks. It's trolling plain and simple.
Plus, anyone who cares to google your name will quickly discover that you seem to just have something against Waid. You've taken to the internet to slam his handling of the Hulk, Fantastic Four, Kingdom Come and Daredevil. On this board you popped up before Waid's run began to scream about how much you hate him and now you're back to simply continue screaming. And not just this board. You seem to have cut and paste your "I hate Waid" rants across multiple message boards. All of which just screams attention grabbing.
As for how much you have/haven't read Daredevil - you don't seem to be particularly familiar with anything. You rant about how him being a lawyer is essential to his character but then praise Miller (who took away his license) and Nocenti (who mostly wrote him without the ability to practice). You have only a black and white sense of the character - lacking any knowledge of the complexity that actually following the book for a long time would give you.
I mean, comon, you're posting over and over again on multiple boards about a book you don't read and haven't read in over five years.
People, including myself, have tried to engage you on the merits but you're entirely uninterested in anything other than your own opinion.
Give it a rest. _________________ JC
So why can't you see the funny side?
Why aren't you laughing? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Daredevil24 Humanity's Fathom
Joined: 06 Apr 2011 Posts: 367
|
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 5:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
While you guys both seem to raise interesting points I have to agree with Jriddle on Waid's DD but I've already said me piece on that.I never really followed Waid too much but the things that I've read weren't too bad. I just never felt he was the right writer for DD but that's just me. Flash Superman Spider-man Captain America and Fantastic 4 always seem like his kind of characters to me |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Darkdevil Humanity's Fathom

Joined: 04 Apr 2009 Posts: 331 Location: The Bright, Sunny South
|
Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2014 9:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm excited for this.
Rodriguez's art looks great. While Matt's relationship with his father has oft-been explored to great success, the backstory of his mother is pretty much a wide-open book so I'm looking forward to seeing what Waid has planned and how it will affect Matt's views of both his mother and his father. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Marcus Plato Flying Blind
Joined: 15 Sep 2011 Posts: 84 Location: Perth, Western Australia
|
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2014 11:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi James Castle,
FYI...
I'm 42.
I've been reading and and collecting DD for over 30 years.
I own all but four issues.
I wrote my thesis on DD 20 years ago, and got a high distinction.
I've had a documentary made about my collection and love of DD that aired nationally on Australian television.
I have LIVED MY LIFE AROUND DAREDEVIL.
I am a Daredevil scholar, fullstop.
If Waid messes with Jack or Maggie (characters we all love) to an IRREVERSIBLE degree, like he did with DD's secret identity, I'm done.
So tell me, am I a troll? Does my opinion count?
You know what? Screw it.
Recently there's been too much animosity on this site.
Good news; you won't hear from me again.
Peace. Out.
P.S. I won't say this "over and over".
http://www.manwithoutfear.com/gallery/Marcus-Plato |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
james castle Devil in Cell-Block D
Joined: 30 Jul 2004 Posts: 1999 Location: Toronto, Ontario
|
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2014 1:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Marcus Plato wrote: |
I'm 42.
I've been reading and and collecting DD for over 30 years.
I own all but four issues.
I wrote my thesis on DD 20 years ago, and got a high distinction.
I've had a documentary made about my collection and love of DD that aired nationally on Australian television.
I have LIVED MY LIFE AROUND DAREDEVIL.
I am a Daredevil scholar, fullstop.
|
I alternatively don't believe and don't care about any of that.
Quote: |
If Waid messes with Jack or Maggie (characters we all love) to an IRREVERSIBLE degree, like he did with DD's secret identity, I'm done.
|
Okay.
Quote: |
So tell me, am I a troll? Does my opinion count?
|
Nah, you're good. It's jriddle that is being intentionally disruptive and trolly.
Quote: |
You know what? Screw it.
Recently there's been too much animosity on this site.
|
Due, in no small part, to you.
Quote: |
Good news; you won't hear from me again. |
Don't know if that's good news. Not sure it's even news. It's just a thing.
What's with the weird angel/devil wings? _________________ JC
So why can't you see the funny side?
Why aren't you laughing? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Marcus Plato Flying Blind
Joined: 15 Sep 2011 Posts: 84 Location: Perth, Western Australia
|
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2014 7:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"Due in no small part to me"?
Wow. And here was me thinking I was keeping it civil.
Peace. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
|