|
Daredevil Message Board The Board Without Fear!
|
The Message Board is currently in read-only mode, as the software is now out of date. Several features and pages have been removed. If/When I get time I intend to re-launch the board with updated software.
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
ninjacop Flying Blind
Joined: 12 Oct 2012 Posts: 20 Location: Lancashire
|
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2012 7:40 pm Post subject: What is DD to you? |
|
|
Hi all
I'm personally loving the current run on DD and think it is the best since Bendis and Maleev left. However i'm getting the feeling on the board and across the web that alot of people aren't that keen on it.
Then it occured to me, DD is like Doctor Who or James Bond, everybody has their 'favourite', and with each new run by a writer/artist team there is almost a new DD.
My question is what is DD to you if not the current run, what defines DD. For me it is Bendis/Maleev but I love the current run because it is so refreshing after a decade of grim and gritty DD.
Thanks _________________ "Wait, it's about to rain, when it rains it's like I can see" |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Pete Fall From Grace
Joined: 29 Jul 2004 Posts: 417 Location: Liverpool, UK
|
Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 2:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Daredevil to me is the guy I read for the first time way back in 1973! It was a reprint of DD #1 by Lee/ Everett and that is the version thats stuck with me.
Everything else since are just variations or interpretations of that guy, some good, some not so good. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ronald Flying Blind
Joined: 19 Nov 2012 Posts: 13 Location: United States
|
Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 3:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I started reading Daredevil in the Brubaker era (with a few minor exceptions), but I have read some of the Bendis stories as well. Both writers had a similar take on the character of DD; a man tenacious beyond all else, but with a definite self-destructive streak. They had taken the gritty Daredevil story about as far as it could go, so it was definitely time for a change. In general, Mark Waid has done a great job of re-inventing DD (or at least returning him to his pre-Miller roots).
The things that bother me about Waid's tenure are these; he didn't follow up on many of the story threads after "Shadowland", he has neglected many of Daredevil's associates, and he has moved towards more of a mainstream superhero story instead of the street-level adventures from before. These changes seem calculated to bring DD to a wider audience (which seems to be working!) but I have been a bit put off by it. Just the same, one can't wallow in misery forever, so maybe it's all for the best.
Ron |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kuljit Mithra Hardcore

Joined: 29 Jul 2004 Posts: 1530 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
My first DD comic was a Lee/Wood reprint book, but I think I relate more to the O'Neil/Mazzucchelli run, since that's when I started collecting monthly. But as I've worked forwards and backwords getting all the issues, it's really opened my eyes to all the talent that has worked on this title. _________________ Kuljit Mithra
www.manwithoutfear.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ryu Murdock Playing to the Camera

Joined: 05 Jan 2005 Posts: 175 Location: Cainta Rizal, Philippines
|
Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 12:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Bendis is my favorite DD scribe. But to say his version of Daredevil is my definition of Daredevil would be wrong.
Cliché as it may sound. Life is like a wheel indeed. Your at the bottom one day, on the top the next, and may be possessed by a demon tomorrow. With Waid's run, Matt seems to be at the top right now, and to say he climbed up from the very bottom and maid that wheel turn is an understatement. That man suffered! I love Waid's run because he is just giving Matt his overdue happy go lucky life, less trials and tribulations. But being estranged from your bestfriend and not being able to do anything about it is quite a hard blow. He might not be getting the punches he got during Bendis and Brubaker's run, but Waid is starting to turn that wheel yet again from what I can see.
Writers all over can write DD however they want. But they should not stop writing stories where Matt overcomes the challenges set forth to him. Because that is what Matt is, that is what DD should be. Someone or something that will overcome anything no matter how crazy life gets. _________________ "I'm only a DEVIL to those who are demonic." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Darkdevil Humanity's Fathom

Joined: 04 Apr 2009 Posts: 331 Location: The Bright, Sunny South
|
Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 1:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Kuljit Mithra wrote: | My first DD comic was a Lee/Wood reprint book, but I think I relate more to the O'Neil/Mazzucchelli run, since that's when I started collecting monthly. But as I've worked forwards and backwords getting all the issues, it's really opened my eyes to all the talent that has worked on this title. |
A spot-on statement. I think whatever version of DD you first read, that is your DD, what drew you into the character and his world and made you want to continue reading of them.
For me, that would be Miller, O'Neill, and Mazz. But as you said, as I've read more of past issues, I'm learning of the talented creators who have each added to the DD mythos.
Although as I've admitted previously in other threads, I'm still on the fence about Bendis. I've read of his propensity for ignoring various bits of continuity in favor of whatever the current story requires, but should it matter if he ignored say, a panel or line of dialogue from 1975 if the end result is an entertaining and engaging story? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
AP Flying Blind

Joined: 08 Jul 2010 Posts: 55
|
Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 6:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ronald wrote: | .....a man tenacious beyond all else, but with a definite self-destructive streak... Ron |
That sounds pretty accurate to me. My favorite iteration of the character is Miller's, but Waid's is a close second.
For me, one of the defining characteristics that is often overlooked or ignored by writers is DD's sense of humor. The humor that I think suits him best is the wry, witty humor introduced after the Stan Lee era, not the Spidey wisecracking copycat crap Stan saddled him with. Miller got it and Waid definitely gets it, but it is something that most writers overlook, especially the past few years. I absolutely love the inner monologue that Waid writes for Matt because at some point he always showcases that wonderful humor that Matt possesses. For me, it makes him more relateable and believeable and not some humorless, cardboard boy scout.
The grim and gritty stories are great, but without a little humor to lighten things occasionally, you get a one-dimensional character that, in my opinion, is boring and difficult to feel for. That's a huge reason why I just don't quite enjoy the Bendis/Brubaker era as much as others. They often leave out one of the most essential characteristics that humans possess. It really doesn't take much, a little subtle humor here and there goes a long way. Miller certainly got it. Go back and look, his run isn't quite as dark as you think. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
|