View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Disco_Stu Flying Blind
Joined: 21 Nov 2005 Posts: 76 Location: Louisiana
|
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 9:29 pm Post subject: Daredevil's darkest nights and brightest stories count down |
|
|
I don't have a huge problem with the list except Daredevil Reborn has no business being any where on that list.
http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=49465 _________________ Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
qtmxd Playing to the Camera
Joined: 19 Sep 2010 Posts: 149
|
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 11:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I could barely read this... they count so many issues into the runs that it seems to include every DD, good or bad, every published, even including the Diggle run. The writer seems to like everything.
And what's with "the place for innovative writers and artists to prove themselves, often before before venturing out and tackling the big guns of the Marvel Universe."? The usual disrespect for DD, but it's not even true. Colan hardly needed to prove himself, Miller went to DC for his "big gun", and sales aside, Bendis's "proving himself" on DD led to an artistic comedown on Avengers. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Disco_Stu Flying Blind
Joined: 21 Nov 2005 Posts: 76 Location: Louisiana
|
Posted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 12:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
qtmxd wrote: |
And what's with "the place for innovative writers and artists to prove themselves, often before before venturing out and tackling the big guns of the Marvel Universe."? The usual disrespect for DD, but it's not even true. Colan hardly needed to prove himself, Miller went to DC for his "big gun", and sales aside, Bendis's "proving himself" on DD led to an artistic comedown on Avengers. |
I couldn't agree more. Bendis, and Brubaker, were already big dogs at Marvel before they started writing DD. Now what do you mean by sales aside? I thought Bemdis' s DD run did well in sales other wise Marvel would not have kept him on for so long. _________________ Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gianni Flying Blind
Joined: 16 Oct 2012 Posts: 26 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 3:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
"Brian Michael Bendis had the unenviable task of following Kevin Smith as regular writer of the book"
Is it supposed to be from worst to best? Waid better than Bendis, Brubaker and Nocenti?
It's a mad world |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
the gael Playing to the Camera
Joined: 29 Aug 2004 Posts: 119
|
Posted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 12:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I agree with everything posted above. Diggle's run in the top 10 of DD best stories ? Kevin Smith better than Ann Nocenti ? (considering how much his "guardian devil" story is full of plot holes and mistakes) Bendis "having the unenviable task of following him as regular writer of the book" is so fun to read (knowing that, at the time, Bendis was considered the strongest writer at Marvel. Things have changed since...)
"the place for innovative writers and artists to prove themselves, often before before venturing out and tackling the big guns of the Marvel Universe."
What a wonderful misinterpretation. Yes, the Daredevil book is the place for innovation, and that's why, unlike it is written, so many famous artists want their own run on the book. The only two artists for which DD was "a revelation" were John Romita Sr (who wanted to stay on the book but Stan Lee needed him on Spiderman) and Franck Miller (who wasn't named on a "bigger" Marvel book but left for DC...). All the others were allready proven artists. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
qtmxd Playing to the Camera
Joined: 19 Sep 2010 Posts: 149
|
Posted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 1:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
By "sales aside", I meant my assumption that Bendis's Avengers (or anyone's Avengers) sells better than his (or anyone's) DD, although it's inferior artistically. Like, don't do all that mature stuff that he did on DD ... just some Spider-Man and Wolverine schtick, and big explosions. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Disco_Stu Flying Blind
Joined: 21 Nov 2005 Posts: 76 Location: Louisiana
|
Posted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 8:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
qtmxd wrote: | By "sales aside", I meant my assumption that Bendis's Avengers (or anyone's Avengers) sells better than his (or anyone's) DD, although it's inferior artistically. Like, don't do all that mature stuff that he did on DD ... just some Spider-Man and Wolverine schtick, and big explosions. |
I don't really keep up with numbers but I always assumed it did pretty well considering how long it lasted and now they have his run in omnibus collections. _________________ Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dimetre Underboss
Joined: 16 Feb 2006 Posts: 1366 Location: Toronto
|
Posted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 9:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Disco_Stu wrote: | I couldn't agree more. Bendis, and Brubaker, were already big dogs at Marvel before they started writing DD. |
True enough about Brubaker, but "Wake Up" was the first thing Bendis ever wrote for Marvel. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
qtmxd Playing to the Camera
Joined: 19 Sep 2010 Posts: 149
|
Posted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 10:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
True, but I thought Bendis was considered a rising star with smaller companies, and Marvel was very happy to have him. DD has had plenty of bad runs, but also a lot of artistically ambitious ones. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Disco_Stu Flying Blind
Joined: 21 Nov 2005 Posts: 76 Location: Louisiana
|
Posted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 10:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I still think Bendis was a huge writer for Marvel before DD. He pretty much became a house whole name because of Ultimate Spider-Man _________________ Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Katerine Flying Blind
Joined: 05 Feb 2008 Posts: 45 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 1:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dimetre wrote: | Disco_Stu wrote: | I couldn't agree more. Bendis, and Brubaker, were already big dogs at Marvel before they started writing DD. |
True enough about Brubaker, but "Wake Up" was the first thing Bendis ever wrote for Marvel. |
To add to what Disco_Stu said...
Bendis was the original writer of Ultimate Spider-man, which apparently began (according to wikipedia) in October 2000. It was hugely popular... pretty-much immediately, as I recall. (For good reason; it was really, really well-written, especially the earlier issues. Even more than DD, USM is probably the biggest reason I became a Bendis fan).
Also according to wikipedia, the first issue of "Wake Up" was written in May 2001.
Assuming these dates are correct, then Bendis was writing USM before he started on DD. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
qtmxd Playing to the Camera
Joined: 19 Sep 2010 Posts: 149
|
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 2:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That DD is a just proving ground for new writers before they go on to big stuff, or DD has especially ridiculous villains, or DD is second rate fighter, are among the untrue things about DD that just keep getting repeated until they become conventional wisdom. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
james castle Devil in Cell-Block D
Joined: 30 Jul 2004 Posts: 1999 Location: Toronto, Ontario
|
Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 5:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This quote from comicbookresources' review of the (very crappy) End of Days finale tells you everything you need to know:
Quote: | In the end, since this is the eighth issue of an eight-issue series, readers are given an ending. As with all great stories though, the ending of "Daredevil: End of Days" #8 delivers a beginning. Where things go from here remains to be seen, but it all makes sense and causes me to wish for more. As a standalone issue, this would be a great, self-aware tale, but as an eighth and final installment of a bigger arc, it's much more satisfying, bringing to a close the quest of Ben Urich and the mystery of Mapone. If you missed out on this one, you need to do one thing: find them all or wait for the collection. This is a Daredevil story that every Daredevil fan should have. |
CBR is a barely arms length promotional branch of the publishers. They get "exclusives" (i.e. publishers giving them info) and, in exchange, are super enthusiastic about EVERYTHING the publishers do. Now that Daredevil is getting a RELAUNCH! (so exciting!) it makes sense that they would crap out an article listing almost every issue of DAREDEVIL! being great! _________________ JC
So why can't you see the funny side?
Why aren't you laughing? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dimetre Underboss
Joined: 16 Feb 2006 Posts: 1366 Location: Toronto
|
Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Katerine wrote: | Dimetre wrote: | Disco_Stu wrote: | I couldn't agree more. Bendis, and Brubaker, were already big dogs at Marvel before they started writing DD. |
True enough about Brubaker, but "Wake Up" was the first thing Bendis ever wrote for Marvel. |
To add to what Disco_Stu said...
Bendis was the original writer of Ultimate Spider-man, which apparently began (according to wikipedia) in October 2000. It was hugely popular... pretty-much immediately, as I recall. (For good reason; it was really, really well-written, especially the earlier issues. Even more than DD, USM is probably the biggest reason I became a Bendis fan).
Also according to wikipedia, the first issue of "Wake Up" was written in May 2001.
Assuming these dates are correct, then Bendis was writing USM before he started on DD. |
I can't remember where I read that "Wake Up" was the first thing that Bendis wrote for Marvel, but I'm absolutely certain that I did.
If you remember back then, David Mack's "Parts of a Hole" arc was coming out ridiculously behind schedule because Joe Quesada was always late with the art, and he was taking over as Editor-In-Chief at the time. It would be months between issues. So even if he wrote "Wake Up" first, it's entirely understandable that Ultimate Spider-Man was released earlier. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
qtmxd Playing to the Camera
Joined: 19 Sep 2010 Posts: 149
|
Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 11:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Come to think of it, wasn't Bendis's first Marvel story that thankfully forgotten DD single issue with the art that looked like etch-a-sketch? Or was that after Wake-Up?
As far as I can tell from wikipedia's , USP did precede Wake UP, October 2000 vs. May 2001. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|